不同溶蚀速率对灰岩单裂隙渗流-溶解模型的影响

    Influence of different dissolution rate on model of coupled single fracture flow and dissolution for limestone

    • 摘要: 我国岩溶分布面积较广,为研究其裂隙发育变化常采用数值模拟手段,而不同溶蚀速率表达对模型计算结果影响较大。为比较不同机理下溶蚀速率方程的影响,考虑表面反应或扩散迁移的单一因素控制以及两者联合控制,并以灰岩平行板单裂隙为例,建立基于不同溶蚀速率的渗流-溶解耦合模型并进行求解。比较各模型结果可以看出:当反应速率仅考虑单一因素时,溶蚀深度相对较浅、溶蚀量较少,且通过裂隙的流量也较小,尤其是流量陡增的“临界点”更是远滞后于两因素联合控制的临界点。因此,长期溶蚀作用下基于不同溶蚀速率的模型结果差异较为显著,在实际应用时应根据研究部位和研究时段选择合适的溶蚀速率方程。

       

      Abstract: Karst is widely distributed in China. The numerical simulation is often used to study the development and change of karst fractures. The expression of different dissolution rates has a great influence on the results of the numerical model. In order to compare the effects of dissolution rate equations under different mechanisms, such as surface reaction and diffuse migration and their combination, we took the single fracture of limestone parallel plate as an example to establish models of coupled fracture flow and chemical dissolution with different dissolution rates. The analysis results show that when the reaction rate is determined by only one factor, the dissolution depth is shallower and the dissolution amount and fracture flow is smaller. Especially the critical point lagged behind the one that is determined by two factors. From long term view, the results of two different models would be more distinguished, so we should select the appropriate dissolution rate model based on actual condition.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回