水资源承载力评价关键因子与高效评价方法研究

    Research on evaluation key factors and efficient evaluation methods for water resource carrying capacity

    • 摘要: 适宜的评价指标和评价方法是确保水资源承载力评价科学、客观的关键。为识别影响水资源承载力评价的关键因子,并探索高效的评价方法,以2020年中国各地区指标数据为基础,结合水资源承载力的内涵,从经济、人口、环境3个维度构建了包含20项指标的水资源承载力评价指标体系,采用障碍度模型从定性和定量两方面筛选关键指标,对4种单一评价方法(熵权-TOPSIS、熵权-线性加权、模糊综合评价和因子分析法)和3种组合评价方法(模糊Borda法、漂移度组合评价法、离差最大化组合评价法)开展比较研究,并基于研究结果对2004~2022年中国水资源承载力演变趋势开展测度分析。结果表明:(1)影响中国水资源承载力的关键因子是人均水资源占有量(障碍度指数高达0.556),其次是生态环境用水比例(障碍度指数0.181)和农村生活污水处理率(障碍度指数0.057)等指标。(2)组合评价法在稳定性和趋势性方面的表现优于单一评价法,但其计算过程较为复杂,组合评价法中,离差最大化组合评价法表现最优,平均误差仅为1.56%;单一评价法中,熵权-线性加权法表现最优,平均误差为4.30%。(3) 2004~2022年中国水资源承载力指数从0.115增长至0.867,主要得益于政府在推动节约用水和生态环境改善方面发挥的关键作用。研究成果可为区域水资源管理提供科学依据。

       

      Abstract: Appropriate evaluation indicators and methods are crucial for ensuring the scientific and objective assessment of water resource carrying capacity.This study aims to identify key factors affecting the evaluation of water resource carrying capacity and to explore efficient evaluation methods.Based on indicator data from various regions in China in2020,an evaluation index system for water resource carrying capacity was constructed from three dimensions: economy, population, and environment.An obstacle degree model was employed to qualitatively and quantitatively screen key indicators.Comparative studies were conducted on four single evaluation methods(Entropy weighting-TOPSIS,entropy weighting-linear weighting, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and factor analysis method) and three combined evaluation methods(fuzzy Borda method, drift degree combined evaluation method, and variance maximization combined evaluation method).Based on the research results, a measurement analysis of the evolution trend of China′s water resource carrying capacity from2004to2022was conducted.The results indicate:(1) The key factor affecting China′s water resource carrying capacity is the per capita water resource possession(obstacle degree index up to0.556),followed by the proportion of ecological environment water use(obstacle degree index0.181) and the rural domestic sewage treatment rate(obstacle degree index0.057) among other indicators.(2) Combined evaluation methods outperform single evaluation methods in terms of stability and trend, but their calculation process is more complex.Among the combined evaluation methods, the variance maximization combined evaluation method performs the best, with an average error of only1.56%;among the single evaluation methods, the entropy weighting-linear weighting method performs the best, with an average error of4.30%.(3) From2004to2022,China′s water resource carrying capacity index increased from0.115to0.867,mainly due to the key role of the government in promoting water conservation and ecological environment improvement.The research outcomes can provide a scientific basis for regional water resource management.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回