基于振动台试验的强震诱发崩塌失稳临界判据研究

    Experimental study on critical criterion for strong earthquake-induced collapse instability based on large-scale shaking table test

    • 摘要: 中国西南地区分布着大量的危岩体,在地震作用下极易发生崩塌灾害。通过大型振动台模型试验,研究了强震条件下不同地震波加载方向、不同加载振幅下的失稳破坏模式和地震动加速度响应,并提出了崩塌失稳临界偏转角的理论公式以及验证方法。试验结果表明:地震波加载方向为X的破坏模式主要为倾倒破坏,地震波加载方向为XZ的破坏模式主要为滑移和倾倒的混合破坏。两种地震波加载方向的加速度响应特征为:随着边坡高程的升高,两种方向的峰值加速度(PGA)放大系数明显增大,二者PGA放大系数曲线趋势基本一致。但X加载方向的放大系数值大于XZ加载方向的放大系数。在相同加载方向时,加载振幅越大,PGA放大系数也会随之增加。不同的地震波加载方向会导致不同的破坏模式,也会引起临界偏转角略有不同,理论计算得出倾倒破坏的临界偏转角为34.28°,滑移和倾倒混合破坏的临界偏转角则需要根据水平位移以及竖直位移进行计算。分析结果与试验现象能够较好地吻合,进一步揭示了强震作用下不同加载方向及振幅对危岩体的失稳破坏模式与地震动加速度的影响。

       

      Abstract: A large number of hazardous rock masses are distributed in Southwest China, which are highly susceptible to collapse under earthquake action. Through large-scale shaking table model tests, this study investigated the instability failure modes and acceleration responses of hazardous rock masses subjected to different seismic wave loading directions and amplitudes. Theoretical equations for the critical deflection angle leading to collapse instability were also derived and subsequently validated. The test results indicate that under horizontal seismic loading, the predominant failure mode is toppling. In contrast, when seismic waves are applied at a 45° angle to both the horizontal and vertical directions, the failure mode is characterized by a combination of sliding and toppling. The acceleration responses under the two loading directions exhibit the following characteristics: as the slope elevation increases, the peak ground acceleration (PGA) amplification factor increases significantly for both loading directions, and the overall trend of the amplification factor curves is largely similar. However, the amplification factor values are consistently larger under purely horizontal loading than under the mixed-direction loading. Furthermore, for a given loading direction, the PGA amplification factor increases with increasing loading amplitude. Different seismic wave loading directions lead to distinct failure modes and marginally different critical deflection angles. Theoretical calculations show that the critical deflection angle for toppling failure is 34.28°, whereas the critical angle for the mixed sliding-toppling failure mode needs to be determined by considering both horizontal and vertical displacements. The analytical results are in good agreement with the experimental observations, further revealing the effects of varying loading directions and amplitudes on the instability failure modes and acceleration responses of critical rock masses under strong seismic actions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回