基于电站调峰运行的梯级水电站衔接水位改进方法

    Improved method for determining connecting water level of cascade hydropower stations based on peak regulation operation

    • 摘要: 最小下泄流量是流域水资源管理中协调梯级电站水资源综合利用最重要的指标之一,一般通过衔接水位确定梯级电站最小下泄流量执行条件。关于衔接水位确定因素的相关研究主要集中于梯级水库运行水位重叠、梯级水库间河道水深以及生态保护等方面,对极端高温频发、“双碳”目标背景下电站调峰运行因素考虑不足。以A河流下游TJZ—SW梯级电站为对象,针对电网调峰需求激增与河流生态流量保障协同问题,提出基于调峰运行的梯级水电站衔接水位改进方法,并与传统的梯级水位重叠法、下游河道水深法进行对比分析。结果表明:①基于调峰运行的改进梯级水位衔接法确定的TJZ-SW梯级最优衔接水位为430.57 m,TJZ、SW电站综合调峰幅度相对于梯级水位重叠法、下游河道水深法分别提升了0.2%,8.8%;②调峰导向的衔接水位机制通过保持梯级电站河段水深满足低谷时段生态环境需求,TJZ、SW电站分别通过“脉冲式”蓄能、水头-流量优化策略提高发电收益,使梯级总收益提升6.5%,实现了“保生态”与“求效益”两者矛盾的阶段性和解; ③基于调峰运行的改进梯级水位衔接法有效协调了梯级电站发电效益、电网安全运行、河流生态流量保障等多个目标,低谷时段TJZ电站零下泄蓄能与SW电站前期蓄水的协同,在保障全时段生态流量达标率100%的同时,实现调峰-经济协同优化,生态、调峰、发电效益显著。研究提出的方法为A河流流域破解“保生态”与“强调峰”矛盾提供了新路径,也可为长江流域梯级电站的协同优化调度提供参考。

       

      Abstract: The minimum discharge flow is one of the most critical indicators for coordinating the comprehensive utilization of water resources in cascade hydropower stations within basin water resource management. Generally, the implementation conditions of the minimum discharge for cascade hydropower stations are determined by the connecting water level. Existing researches on factors that influence connecting water level determination has primarily focused on cascade reservoir operating water level overlap, river channel water depth between cascade reservoirs, and ecological protection. However, insufficient attention has been paid to the impact of power station peak-shaving operations against the backdrop of frequent extreme high temperatures and the "Double Carbon" goal. Taking the TJZ-SW cascade hydropower stations in the lower reaches of the A River as the research case, this study proposes an improved method for determining the connecting water level of cascade hydropower stations based on peak-shaving operations, aiming to address the collaborative challenge of surging grid peak-shaving demand and river ecological flow protection. A systematic comparative analysis was performed between the proposed method and two traditional approaches, namely the cascade water level overlap method and the downstream river channel water depth method. The research demonstrates that: ① The optimal connecting water level of the TJZ-SW cascade determined by the improved cascade water level connection method based on peak-shaving operations is 430.57 m. The comprehensive peak-shaving amplitudes of the TJZ and SW power stations are increased by 0.2% and 8.8%, respectively, compared with the cascade water level overlap method and the downstream river channel water depth method.② The peak-shaving-oriented connecting water level mechanism maintains the water depth in the cascade power station reach to meet the ecological and environmental needs during low-valley periods. The TJZ and SW power stations improve power generation revenue through "pulse-type" energy storage and water head-flow optimization strategies, respectively, increasing the total cascade revenue by 6.5% and achieving a phased reconciliation of the contradiction between "ecological protection" and "benefit pursuit".③ The improved cascade water level connection method based on peak-shaving operations effectively coordinates multiple objectives such as power generation benefits of cascade power stations, safe grid operation, and river ecological flow protection. The coordination of zero discharge for energy storage of TJZ during low-valley periods and early water storage of SW ensures 100% compliance with ecological flow throughout the entire period while achieving collaborative optimization of peak-shaving and economic benefits, with remarkable ecological, peak-shaving, and power generation benefits. The method proposed in this study provides a new road for resolving the contradiction between "ecological protection" and "peak-shaving emphasis" in the A River Basin and can also serve as a reference for the collaborative optimal dispatching of cascade hydropower stations in the Changjiang River Basin.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回