基于机理-深度学习耦合模型的流域洪水预报研究

    Research on River Basin Flood Forecasting based on Coupled Mechanism-Deep Learning Model

    • 摘要: 流域洪水预报对防汛抢险和水资源管理具有重要意义。为探究机理-深度学习耦合在流域洪水预报中的应用,本研究以东苕溪上游流域为研究对象,构建了新安江模型(XAJ)、2种深度学习模型(LSTM、CNN-LSTM)和6种机理-深度学习耦合模型(PIML1/2/3-LSTM/CNN-LSTM),系统探讨了9种模型在洪水预报中的应用效果。结果表明:(1)XAJ模型整体稳定性较高,验证集平均NSE为0.87,但高流量段存在系统性低估,RE和REP指标绝对值均大于15%;(2)深度学习模型(LSTM、CNN-LSTM)在高流量段表现优于XAJ模型,但NSE略低,相对XAJ模型分别下降了5.7%和10.3%;(3)耦合模型中,仅引入XAJ输出流量(QXAJ)的PIML1型模型精度最优,其中,PIML1-LSTM模型的RE和REP指标相对XAJ模型提升了71.9%和33.2%;而引入土壤含水量(QSXW)的PIML2型模型性能显著下降,表明物理模型中部分中间变量的传递可能会抑制机器学习效果;(4)耦合模型通过牺牲少量整体拟合度,换取了关键洪水特征指标的显著提升,对于防洪决策具有重要实践价值,研究建议优先采用PIML1型架构,在保持物理可解释性的同时优化预报精度。本研究揭示了机理模型变量选择对耦合模型性能的影响规律,为优化水文物理-数据驱动耦合建模提供了理论依据。

       

      Abstract: River basin flood forecasting is of great significance for flood control and emergency response as well as water resource management. To explore the application of mechanism-deep learning coupling in river basin flood forecasting, this study takes the upper reaches of the Dongtiao River Basin as the research object, and constructs the Xin'anjiang model (XAJ), two deep learning models (LSTM, CNN-LSTM), and six mechanism-deep learning coupling models (PIML1/2/3-LSTM/CNN-LSTM). The application effects of these 9 models in flood forecasting are systematically discussed. The results show: (1) The overall stability of the XAJ model is relatively high, with an average NSE of 0.87 in the validation set, but there is a systematic underestimation in the high-flow section, and the absolute values of the RE and REP indicators are all greater than 15%; (2) The deep learning models (LSTM, CNN-LSTM) perform better than the XAJ model in the high-flow section, but have a slightly lower NSE, which is 5.7% and 10.3% lower than that of the XAJ model respectively; (3) Among the coupling models, only the PIML1 type model that introduces the output flow (QXAJ) of the XAJ has the best accuracy, among which, the PIML1-LSTM model's RE and REP indicators are 71.9% and 33.2% higher than those of the XAJ model respectively; while the PIML2 type model that introduces soil moisture content (QSXW) has a significant performance decline, indicating that some intermediate variables in the physical model may inhibit the learning effect of machine learning; (4) The coupling models sacrifice a small amount of overall fitting degree to achieve a significant improvement in key flood characteristic indicators, which has important practical value for flood control decisions. The research suggests that the PIML1 type architecture should be prioritized, while maintaining the physical interpretability to optimize the forecast accuracy. This study reveals the influence rules of variable selection in mechanism models on the performance of coupling models, providing a theoretical basis for optimizing hydrological physical-data-driven coupling modeling.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回