赤水河流域生态环境政策演进特征及协同性研究

    • 摘要: 本研究旨在系统分析赤水河流域生态环保政策的演进特征与结构特点,以揭示跨省流域协同治理的政策逻辑与优化路径。通过收集历年来赤水河流域相关政策文本,采用量化分析方法,从政策力度、发文主体、政策主题及政策工具等维度进行深入解析。研究发现:政策出台历经探索(2012年之前)、先行先试(2012年-2020年)与协同治理(2020年之后)三个阶段,数量与力度持续增强,呈现贵州试点先行、中央重视推动、川滇两省跟进响应的过程;发文主体呈现立法、司法与行政部门协同的多元网络,横向发文主导主体为立法和司法机构,纵向发文主导主体为政府部门,纵向层级间存在互补;政策主题目标日趋多元与体系化,可归并划分为四类,中央、省级层面以实现跨域、跨部门协调为宗旨,县区层面以扩大在地利益为归结;政策工具多样但行政命令型占绝对主导,其中以事前引导型政策为主要手段,经济激励型和多元主体合作型工具相对缺乏,省级是开展政策工具设计的主要层级。本研究建议进一步加强地域、部门间协调合作,逐渐完善生态环境与产业、社会发展贯通的政策网络,自下而上创新设计更多监督、评估、激励类政策工具,加大政策实施保障力度,实现流域生态优先和绿色发展。

       

      Abstract: This study aims to systematically analyze the evolutionary characteristics and structural features of ecological and environmental protection policies in the Chishui River Basin, thereby revealing the policy logic and optimization pathways for collaborative governance in trans-provincial river basins. By collecting policy texts related to the Chishui River Basin over the years and employing quantitative analysis methods, an in-depth analysis is conducted from various dimensions, including policy intensity, issuing bodies, policy themes, and policy instruments . The research finds that policy formulation has undergone three stages: exploration (before 2012), piloting and experimentation (2012–2020), and collaborative governance (after 2020). The number and intensity of policies have consistently increased, demonstrating a process characterized by Guizhou taking the lead in pilot initiatives, the central government emphasizing and promoting efforts, and the provinces of Sichuan and Yunnan following up with responses. The issuing bodies form a diverse network involving collaboration among legislative, judicial, and administrative departments. Horizontally, legislative and judicial institutions dominate policy issuance, while vertically, government departments are the primary issuers, showing complementarity across different administrative levels. Policy themes and objectives have become increasingly diverse and systematic, which can be categorized into four types. At the central and provincial levels, the aim is to achieve cross-regional and cross-department coordination, whereas at the county/district level, the focus converges on expanding local interests. A variety of policy instruments are employed, but administrative mandate-based instruments absolutely dominate, with pre-event guidance instruments being the primary means. Economic incentive instruments and multi-stakeholder collaboration instruments are relatively underutilized. The provincial level serves as the main tier for designing policy instruments. This study recommends further strengthening inter-regional and inter-departmental coordination and cooperation, gradually improving the policy network to integrate ecological and environmental considerations with industrial and social development, innovating from the bottom up to design more monitoring, evaluation, and incentive-based policy tools, and enhancing policy implementation guarantees to achieve ecological prioritization and green development in the river basin.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回