水资源核算研究进展

    Research progress of water accounting

    • 摘要: 水资源核算是科学进行水资源管理,促进水资源可持续发展的前提。利用citespace6.2软件采集1906篇国内外水资源核算相关文献资料,对其研究热点演化进行分析,并从研究范围、对象、内容及方法等多层面对已有水资源核算相关文献进行综述,分析其现状及不足。结果显示,国内外水资源核算研究热点经历了从定性到定量等多个演化阶段,从相关理论及核算模型的提出,逐渐演变为对水资源配置、保护以及可持续发展等方面的实际问题分析;水资源核算研究范围涵盖全球、跨国区域、国家或国内某区域等宏观层面,行业中观层面以及企业、居民、政府部门或供应链等微观层面,其中针对全球、第三产业细分部门、供应链、企业等的核算研究相对较少;核算对象包括水资源资产、水资源负债和水资源权益,其中有关水资源负债和权益概念的界定仍存在争议;核算内容包括水资源实物量和价值量,其中对水质的考虑仍相对不足;针对不同研究目标,已有较为丰富的水资源核算方法,但在实际应用中,模糊综合评价法、环境重置成本法等水资源价值核算方法仍存在数据要求高、主观性较强等不足。继而针对已有研究不足,提出加强跨国水资源领域学术交流、完善水资源数据统计、制定水资源核算规范性指导文件、综合运用多种水资源评价方法等进一步完善水资源核算研究的建议。

       

      Abstract: Water accounting is a prerequisite for the scientific management of water resources and the promotion of their sustainable development. With citespace6.2, this study collects 1,906 domestic and international literatures related to water accounting and conducts an analysis of the evolution of research hotspots and provides a comprehensive review of existing literature on water accounting from multiple dimensions, including research scope, objects, content, and methods, analyzing the current status and deficiencies. The results show that the research hotspots on domestic and international water accounting have gone through several stages of evolution, from qualitative to quantitative, evolving from the proposal of relevant theories and accounting models to the analysis of practical problems in water resource allocation, protection, sustainable development and so on; The scope of water accounting research covers macro levels such as global, transnational regions, national or domestic regions, meso levels such as industries, and micro levels such as enterprises, residents, government departments, or supply chains, of which there are relatively few research studies on global, third industry sectors, supply chains, and enterprises; The accounting objects include water resource assets, liabilities, and equity, with the concepts of water resource liabilities and equity still being controversial; The content of accounting includes the physical quantity and the value of water resources, with relatively insufficient consideration of water quality. There are already a variety of water accounting methods for different research objectives, but in practical applications, methods such as the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and the environmental replacement cost method still have shortcomings such as high data requirements and strong subjectivity. In light of the deficiencies in existing research, suggestions are made to strengthen academic exchanges in the field of transnational water resources, improve water resource data statistics, formulate normative guidance documents for water resource accounting, and comprehensively apply various water resource evaluation methods to further improve research on water resource accounting.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回